Trump reiterates US need to ‘have’ Greenland ahead of Vance visit.

​In a recent interview with podcaster Vince Coglianese, President Donald Trump emphasized the United States’ strategic interest in Greenland, stating, “We need Greenland for international safety and security. We need it. We have to have it.” This renewed assertion comes just before Vice President JD Vance’s scheduled visit to the Arctic territory, a move that has intensified diplomatic tensions with Denmark and Greenland.​

Vice President Vance, accompanied by his wife, is set to visit Greenland with the stated aim of enhancing global security. The itinerary includes a stop at the Pituffik Space Base, underscoring the strategic importance the U.S. places on the region. However, both Greenlandic and Danish officials have expressed strong objections to the visit. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen labeled the trip as “unacceptable pressure,” reflecting concerns over U.S. intentions in the region.

President Trump’s interest in acquiring Greenland is not new. During his first term, he proposed purchasing the island, an idea that was promptly rejected by Denmark. The current administration’s renewed focus on Greenland is driven by its strategic location and abundant natural resources, including rare earth minerals and energy reserves. Control over Greenland could also provide the U.S. with significant advantages in Arctic shipping routes and military positioning.

Despite the strategic arguments presented by the U.S., Greenlandic leaders have consistently opposed any notion of American acquisition. They emphasize their cultural identity and aspirations for future independence, rejecting external pressures that could compromise their sovereignty. ​

The timing of Vice President Vance’s visit, coupled with President Trump’s assertive remarks, has heightened diplomatic strains. While the U.S. underscores the importance of Greenland for national and international security, Denmark and Greenland view these actions as encroachments on their autonomy. The unfolding situation underscores the complex geopolitical dynamics in the Arctic region and raises questions about the balance between strategic interests and national sovereignty.